What is a common use case for StringBuilder over String?

The choice highlighting better performance with frequent modifications accurately captures a key advantage of using StringBuilder over String in .NET. Strings in C# are immutable, meaning that once a String object is created, it cannot be changed. When you perform modifications—such as concatenation, substring extraction, or replacements—on a String, a new instance of the String must be created to reflect these changes. This process can lead to significant overhead, especially in scenarios where modifications are frequent, as it results in excessive memory allocation and garbage collection.

In contrast, StringBuilder is designed specifically for situations where a string needs to be modified frequently. It maintains a mutable buffer that can adjust its size dynamically, allowing for more efficient operations like appending, inserting, or removing text without the need to create new string instances repeatedly. This leads to improved performance, particularly in loops or situations where many string modifications occur.

The other choices focus on areas where String may be more relevant or appropriate. Immutability is a characteristic of String, not a use case for StringBuilder. String comparison does not involve the efficiency gains from using StringBuilder since both data types can be compared directly. Regular expression processing typically operates on Strings rather than using StringBuilder, making it less relevant in this context